Spin vs. Professionalism
Good read ...
The cream will rise to the top from alternative sources. Quite honestly, people prefer spin and that is why they go for sources containing it. The MSM knows this much. The only way the major news media might regain its slipping foothold on credibility would be to implement something like what they mention here. If I could count on the news to not have thin syrupy veiled bias all throughout I might be more prone to read it. That said, I don't think the MSM gets it and they may not get it until their entire profession has been replaced by more talented amateurs who turn professional and drive readership by their skill and not just because they happen to work for the New York Times. They are trying to compete with a new model that they are not set up to compete with.
As an exercise I recommend an occasional browse through a Google News search on Catholic Church ... the ignorance will floor you.
Why would I trust a journalist with limited knowledge of my faith to inform others when there are so many knowledgeable Catholics who write well and, more importantly, who will get facts about my faith right?
Google News results on "Catholic Church"
Good read ...
My first mentor in matters journalistic, Seattle's David Brewster, once said that journalism's claim to being a "profession" would remain an affectation until journalism became self-disciplining (like law and medicine), with the members of the guild taking real responsibility for policing themselves. Such professional responsibility means editors keeping editorials out of the news hole, and reporters telling the whole truth. That the misshapen stories cited here are hardly rarities suggests the unhappy probability that David Brewster, who was right thirty years ago, will remain right long into the future.
Which is bad news for American democracy.
The cream will rise to the top from alternative sources. Quite honestly, people prefer spin and that is why they go for sources containing it. The MSM knows this much. The only way the major news media might regain its slipping foothold on credibility would be to implement something like what they mention here. If I could count on the news to not have thin syrupy veiled bias all throughout I might be more prone to read it. That said, I don't think the MSM gets it and they may not get it until their entire profession has been replaced by more talented amateurs who turn professional and drive readership by their skill and not just because they happen to work for the New York Times. They are trying to compete with a new model that they are not set up to compete with.
As an exercise I recommend an occasional browse through a Google News search on Catholic Church ... the ignorance will floor you.
Why would I trust a journalist with limited knowledge of my faith to inform others when there are so many knowledgeable Catholics who write well and, more importantly, who will get facts about my faith right?
Google News results on "Catholic Church"



This is a "fresh" blogroll. It tends to list blogs most frequently updated at the top. It will also drop blogs not updated for a few days. Never fear though, if you post, it will show back up. If you are interested in how I did it see 

Calendar



